Report examples
See every report before you buy
ScheduleInsight produces ten distinct deliverables from your Primavera P6 or Microsoft Project schedule. Browse full working examples — real-format output, fictional project data — so you know exactly what you are getting.
Every one is a print-ready A4 document built to the same standard: a cover carrying the verdict, a contents page, numbered sections holding the narrative and the graphs, and lettered appendices holding every table — so any figure in the argument can be traced to the activities that produced it without leaving the document.
All report types
£10 per report
Schedule Quality report
A full 18-check DCMA assessment of your programme, scored 0–100, with a critical findings table and plain-language narrative ready to share with your client.
- 18-check quality matrix with pass / warn / fail per check
- Schedule Quality Score (SQS) 0–100 with benchmark context
- Plain-language narrative suitable for senior review
- Self-contained HTML + PDF — yours to send, nothing stored by us
- 8 pages, A4 — full 18-check register appended
Included with Quality report
Programme Assurance Review
A programme acceptance review built on four assessment layers, not one score, with the verdict worded to the contract you select rather than as a generic accept/reject. Cover page, contents, a narrative body with the analysis and graphs, and every table in the appendices — written the way a project controls director would present it.
- Assessed against NEC4, JCT or FIDIC — you choose the form
- Execution readiness: do the phases actually hand off in the logic?
- Completeness: does the programme model the whole job?
- Monte Carlo forecast run automatically — no risk workshop needed
- 21 pages, A4, print-ready — narrative in the body, detail in the appendix
Included with Quality report
Executive Brief
A one-page board-ready narrative distilled from your Schedule Quality findings. Translates technical DCMA results into plain English for project directors and steering committees.
- Non-technical summary of quality assessment
- Risk flags presented in plain language
- Signed and dated for formal circulation
- Included with every Schedule Quality report
- 7 pages, A4 — cover, contents, brief, driver register
£15 per report
Baseline Comparison
Activity-level delay identification between a baseline and an update, with a delay waterfall, critical delay path trace, and concurrent delay assessment. Essential for claims and programme health reviews.
- Net delay calculation and delay waterfall chart
- Critical delay path identification per revision
- Concurrent delay detection and quantification
- Excel appendix with full activity-level delta
- 9 pages, A4 — narrative in the body, registers in 3 appendices
£20 per report
Risk Forecast
A full Monte Carlo risk forecast for your remaining programme, calibrated to your working calendar. Produces P50 / P80 / P90 finish dates, a finish-date probability distribution, a criticality tornado, and a narrative report.
- P50 / P80 / P90 completion dates with duration ranges
- Probability of completing by planned date
- Criticality tornado — top risk drivers ranked
- Working-calendar calibrated (UKCS, construction, custom)
- 9 pages, A4 — driver register and simulation settings appended
£25 per report
Acceleration Plan
Least-cost crashing against a budget, a finish date or a milestone. Produces a ranked compression plan — what to shorten, by how many days, at what cost — and the cost-efficiency curve showing where further spend stops buying time.
- Ranked plan, cheapest days first, with the finish after every step
- Cost-efficiency curve with the point your money stops working
- Parallel critical chains cut together — the spend textbook crashing wastes
- Every assumption printed next to the number it produced
- Markdown and Excel exports, plus a crashed .xer that opens in P6
£40 per report
Trend Analysis
Period-by-period delay tracking across three or more schedule revisions. Shows cumulative delay accumulation, completion-date drift, and the key periods where slippage was introduced.
- Period-by-period delay waterfall across revisions
- Completion-date trend chart over reporting cycles
- Cross-update activity matching and reconciliation
- Consolidated PDF + Excel appendix per revision
- 8 pages, A4 — revision register and attribution appended
£80 per report
Claim Brief
A forensic delay and entitlement analysis produced from a completed Comparison or Trend Analysis. Windows and time-impact methods in accordance with AACE 29R-03, with the concurrency treated explicitly and the order-sensitivity of the result published rather than hidden.
- Three forensic delay methods: TIA, Windows, As-Planned vs As-Built
- Per-window narrative with concurrent delay assessment
- Entitlement summary ready for submission to Employer
- AACE 29R-03 aligned — accepted by major contract forms
- 9 pages, A4 — window register, calculation and provenance appended
£10 per report
Submission report
An owner or PMO acceptance gate for programme submissions. Your configured acceptance rule is applied to the 18-check assessment and returns ACCEPT, ACCEPT WITH COMMENTS or REJECT — with the conditions of acceptance stated so the contractor knows exactly what to correct.
- Configurable rule: minimum score, permitted failures and warnings
- Clear ACCEPT / ACCEPT WITH COMMENTS / REJECT decision
- Conditions of acceptance written out check by check
- The same rule applied to every submission, so verdicts are comparable
- 8 pages, A4 — full gate register and the rule in force appended
£15 per report
CE Programme Impact
A prospective, programme-to-programme assessment of an NEC compensation event's effect on planned Completion. The Accepted Programme is impacted by the event alone and re-run, so the movement can be traced activity by activity rather than argued.
- Movement of planned Completion — the measure the ECC asks for
- Driving path evidenced activity by activity, with float consumed
- Key Dates assessed independently of Completion
- States plainly what it does not decide: entitlement, Prices, concurrency
- 9 pages, A4 — driving path, Key Dates and provenance appended
£80 per report
NEC quotation pack
The programme-evidence element of a clause 62 quotation (Contractor) or a clause 64 assessment (Project Manager). Dual-mode and signable, with the time effect evidenced from the programme and a Defined Cost placeholder left for your estimator to complete.
- Contractor (cl.62) and Project Manager (cl.64) dual mode
- Time effect on Completion, with the driving-path evidence behind it
- Defined Cost placeholder — clearly unfilled, never presented as priced
- Assumption register including any stated under clause 61.6
- 8 pages, A4 — driving path, assumptions and provenance appended
All examples use fictional project data. No real schedule data is used or stored.
Ready to analyse your schedule?
Upload your P6 or MSP file. Results in seconds.
No install. No commitment. Your schedule never leaves your browser until you choose to analyse it.